Postel’s Law: Not Sure Who To Be Angry With

February 25th, 2010 John Mount No comments

One of my research interests is finding the principles that underly the management of information, complexity and uncertainty. When something as simple as a web-form is called “technology” it is time to step back and examine your principles. One principle I am not sure about Postel’s law. It doesn’t hold often enough to be relied on and when it fails I am not sure who to be angry with. Read more…

Living in A Lognormal World

February 3rd, 2010 Nina Zumel No comments

Recently, we had a client come to us with (among other things) the following question:
Who is more valuable, Customer Type A, or Customer Type B?

This client already tracked the net profit and loss generated by every customer who used his services, and had begun to analyze his customers by group. He was especially interested in Customer Type A; his gut instinct told him that Type A customers were quite profitable compared to the others (Type B) and he wanted to back up this feeling with numbers.

He found that, on average, Type A customers generate about $92 profit per month, and Type B customers average about $115 per month (The data and figures that we are using in this discussion aren’t actual client data, of course, but a notional example). He also found that while Type A customers make up about 4% of the customer base, they generate less than 4% of the net profit per month. So Type A customers actually seem to be less profitable than Type B customers. Apparently, our client was mistaken.

Or was he? Read more…

Winter 2010 Subscription Campaign

January 18th, 2010 John Mount No comments

We at Win-Vector LLC would like to invite our loyal readers to help with our Winter 2010 Subscription Campaign. Please encourage your erudite friends and colleagues to read and subscribe to http://www.win-vector.com/blog/. Read more…

“Easy” Portfolio Allocation

January 14th, 2010 John Mount No comments

This is an elementary mathematical finance article. This means if you know some math (linear algebra, differential calculus) you can find a quick solution to a simple finance question. The topic was inspired by a recent article in The American Mathematical Monthly (Volume 117, Number 1 January 2010, pp. 3-26): “Find Good Bets in the Lottery, and Why You Shouldn’t Take Them” by Aaron Abrams and Skip Garibaldi which said optimal asset allocation is now an undergraduate exercise. That may well be, but there are a lot of people with very deep mathematical backgrounds that have yet to have seen this. We will fill in the details here. The style is terse, but the content should be about what you would expect from one day of lecture in a mathematical finance course.

Read more…

Relative returns: a banker versus trader paradox

January 7th, 2010 John Mount 1 comment

Quick Joke.

Q: What is the difference between a banker and a trader?
A: A banker will try and tell you a 10% loss followed by a 10% gain is breaking even.

Read more…

Statistics to English Translation, Part 2b: Calculating Significance

December 13th, 2009 Nina Zumel No comments

In the previous installment of the Statistics to English Translation, we discussed the technical meaning of the term ‘’significant”. In this installment, we look at how significance is calculated. This article will be a little more technically detailed than the last one, but our primary goal is still to help you decipher statements about significance in research papers: statements like “
$ (F(2, 864) = 6.6, p = 0.0014)$ ”.

As in the last article, we will concentrate on situations where we want to test the difference of means. You should read that previous article first, so you are familiar with the terminology that we use in this one.

A pdf version of this current article can be found here.
Read more…

CRU graph yet again (with R)

December 13th, 2009 John Mount 3 comments

IowaHawk has a excellent article attempting to reproduce the infamous CRU climate graph using OpenOffice: Fables of the Reconstruction. We thought we would show how to produced similarly bad results using R.

Read more…

Categories: Rants, Statistics Tags: , ,

Statistics to English Translation, Part 2a: ’Significant’ Doesn’t Always Mean ’Important’

December 4th, 2009 Nina Zumel 4 comments

In this installment of our ongoing Statistics to English Translation series1, we will look at the technical meaning of the term ‘’significant”. As you might expect, what it means in statistics is not exactly what it means in everyday language.

As always, a pdf version of this article is available as well. Read more…

R examine objects tutorial

November 21st, 2009 John Mount 4 comments

This article is quick concrete example of how to use the techniques from Survive R to lower the steepness of The R Project for Statistical Computing’s learning curve (so an apology to all readers who are not interested in R). What follows is for people who already use R and want to achieve more control of the software. Read more…

Categories: Coding, Statistics, Tutorials Tags: ,

The Local to Global Principle

November 11th, 2009 John Mount No comments

We describe the “the local to global principle.” It is a principle used to break algorithmic problem solving into two distinct phases (local criticism followed by global solution) and is an aid both in the design and in the application of algorithms. Instead of giving a formal definition of the principle we quickly define it and discuss a few examples and methods. We have produced both a stand-alone PDF (more legible) and a HTML/blog form (more skimable).
Read more…