dplyr work is taking what you consider to be a too long (seconds instead of instant, or minutes instead of seconds, or hours instead of minutes, or a day instead of an hour) then try
For some tasks
data.table is routinely faster than alternatives at pretty much all scales (example timings here).
If your project is large (millions of rows, hundreds of columns) you really should rent an an Amazon EC2 r4.8xlarge (244 GiB RAM) machine for an hour for about $2.13 (quick setup instructions here) and experience speed at scale.
R package is really good at sorting. Below is a comparison of it versus
dplyr for a range of problem sizes.
Continue reading data.table is Really Good at Sorting
Derek Jones recently discussed a possible future for the
R ecosystem in “StatsModels: the first nail in R’s coffin”.
This got me thinking on the future of
CRAN (which I consider vital to
R, and vital in distributing our work) in the era of super-popular meta-packages. Meta-packages are convenient, but they have a profoundly negative impact on the packages they exclude.
tidyverse advertises a popular
R universe where the vital package
data.table never existed.
tidymodels is shaping up to be a popular universe where our own package
vtreat never existed, except possibly as a footnote to
Users currently (with some luck) discover packages like ours and then (because they trust
CRAN) feel able to try them. With popular walled gardens that becomes much less likely. It is one thing for a standard package to duplicate another package (it is actually hard to avoid, and how work legitimately competes), it is quite another for a big-brand meta-package to pre-pick winners (and losers).
All I can say is: please give
vtreat a chance and a try. It is a package for preparing messy real-world data for predictive modeling. In addition to re-coding high cardinality categorical variables (into what we call effect-codes after Cohen, or impact-codes), it deals with missing values, can be parallelized, can be run on databases, and has years of production experience baked in.
Some places to start with
rqdatatable are new
R packages for data wrangling; either at scale (in databases, or big data systems such as Apache Spark), or in-memory. The packages speed up both execution (through optimizations) and development (though a good mental model and up-front error checking) for data wrangling tasks.
Win-Vector LLC‘s John Mount will be speaking on the
rqdatatable packages at the The East Bay R Language Beginners Group Tuesday, August 7, 2018 (Oakland, CA).
Continue reading John Mount speaking on rquery and rqdatatable
We are pleased to announce that seplyr version 0.5.8 is now available on CRAN.
seplyr is an R package that provides a thin wrapper around elements of the dplyr package and (now with version 0.5.8) the tidyr package. The intent is to give the part time R user the ability to easily program over functions from the popular dplyr and tidyr packages. Our assumption is always that a data scientist most often comes to R to work with data, not to tinker with the programming language itself.
Continue reading seplyr 0.5.8 Now Available on CRAN
rquery is an
R package for specifying data transforms using piped Codd-style operators. It has already shown great performance on
rqdatatable is a new package that supplies a screaming fast implementation of the
rquery system in-memory using the
rquery is already one of the fastest and most teachable (due to deliberate conformity to Codd’s influential work) tools to wrangle data on databases and big data systems. And now
rquery is also one of the fastest methods to wrangle data in-memory in
R (thanks to
data.table, via a thin adaption supplied by
Continue reading rqdatatable: rquery Powered by data.table
In statistical work in the age of big data we often get hung up on differences that are statistically significant (reliable enough to show up again and again in repeated measurements), but clinically insignificant (visible in aggregation, but too small to make any real difference to individuals).
An example would be: a diet that changes individual weight by an ounce on average with a standard deviation of a pound. With a large enough population the diet is statistically significant. It could also be used to shave an ounce off a national average weight. But, for any one individual: this diet is largely pointless.
The concept is teachable, but we have always stumbled of the naming “statistical significance” versus “practical clinical significance.”
I am suggesting trying the word “substantial” (and its antonym “insubstantial”) to describe if changes are physically small or large.
This comes down to having to remind people that “p-values are not effect sizes”. In this article we recommended reporting three statistics: a units-based effect size (such as expected delta pounds), a dimensionless effects size (such as Cohen’s d), and a reliability of experiment size measure (such as a statistical significance, which at best measures only one possible risk: re-sampling risk).
The merit is: if we don’t confound different meanings, we may be less confusing. A downside is: some of these measures are a bit technical to discuss. I’d be interested in hearing opinions and about teaching experiences along these distinctions.
Nina Zumel and I have been working on packaging our favorite graphing techniques in a more reusable way that emphasizes the analysis task at hand over the steps needed to produce a good visualization. We are excited to announce the WVPlots is now at version 1.0.0 on CRAN!
Continue reading WVPlots now at version 1.0.0 on CRAN!